Thrust Statement: Paul charges the churches of Galatia
not to preach another way of justification before God other than faith in Jesus
the Messiah.
Scripture Reading: Galatians 1:6-9.
This essay is designed to assist individuals in recapturing the very heart of the Gospel of Christ. Within the Churches of Christ, there is controversy over grace versus works. Many within this movement are trying to swing back to a more biblical stance concerning justification by faith alone in Jesus Christ. Just a casual look at the various journals from a number of camps within this once united movement reveals the turmoil that exists. In spite of Christ’s prayer for unity, this fragmented movement is divided into at least twenty-five feuding splinter groups. There are many leaders within the various shattered divisions that are reexamining the traditional interpretation handed down during the last two hundred years. Many within the Stone/Campbell Movement are trying to call individuals back to a proper understanding of the Gospel of Christ.
This paper is not designed to castigate individuals within the Churches of Christ or Christian Churches, because many are seeking to correct the current mistreatment of Galatians 1;6-9, as well as many other abused Scriptures. The problems that presently exist within many Churches of Christ are a lack of understanding as to the truth of the Gospel of Christ. One of the most often cited Scriptures is Galatians 1:6-9. Many well-meaning leaders today give justification for their separation from other sincere believers by citing this Scripture. Yet, there are others within this movement who are trying to call attention to the context for a proper understanding of the Gospel. Just as Paul had to deal with specifics in his dealing with the Judaizers, so, I, too, must deal with the misapplication of certain Scriptures that Christians have taken out of context to justify their chastisement and separation from other Christians.
Since I have spent most of my ministry (fifty-two years) in this movement, I am well qualified to write on this subject. I spent approximately seventeen years in the one-cup and non-Sunday school movement. After my excommunication for refusing to reject Christians who thought it was okay to have individual communion cups in the Lord’s Supper and Bible study classes, I identified myself with another segment of the Stone/Campbell Movement. I soon discovered that the movement started by Barton Stone and Thomas and Alexander Campbell was/is divided into twenty-five or more distinctive religious societies. Many within the various fellowships accused the others of preaching another gospel.
This paper is written primarily to assist Christians in the various subdivisions within the Churches of Christ to go back to the biblical text and to reexamine the context before building a theology on an isolated passage; generally, the current interpretation of this now famous quotation promotes division and hatred among God’s people. One of the greatest errors that Christians encounter today is the common practice of citing Scriptures in isolation from their context. This is commonly known as proof-texting. This essay looks at Galatians 1:6-9 in order to determine what the Gospel of Christ is all about. This composition is also written to give assistance to those who are seeking to bring about a correct understanding of the Gospel who still remain in one of the splintered groups, which he/she normally had nothing to do in the genesis, or origin, of its birth. In fact, most of us have inherited our heritage from our religious training. Even though I am dealing with individuals within the Stone/Campbell Movement, I am conscious that many leaders within this alliance are endeavoring to bring about a change, just as I am, in understanding concerning a proper comprehension of the Gospel of Christ and also to correct the current practice of dividing every time there is a difference of opinion.
As one seeks to understand the Book of
Galatians, one must come to grips with one’s orthodoxy. Does one’s orthodoxy
set aside God’s grace? Many Christians will readily admit that one must not
allow one’s orthodoxy to set aside God’s grace, but, at the same time, one
quickly discovers that this is the case among many Christians. The Judaizers
had a different set of agendas from the modern church today. The religious
leaders added circumcision and the keeping of the Law as prerequisites to
salvation. On the other hand, numerous Christians, today, have added their own
orthodoxy to faith in order for one to inherit eternal life. Christians, as a
whole, can understand Paul’s reaction to circumcision as a condition of
salvation. For the religious leaders, it was faith plus works. Today, it is
faith plus one’s interpretation of the Scriptures. For some, it is faith plus a
cappella singing—instrumental music is sinful; for others, it is faith plus
one-cup in the distribution of the fruit of the vine in the Lord’s
Supper—individuals cups are condemned; for a few, it is faith plus pinching the
bread in the observance of the Lord’s Supper—one cannot break the bread; for
another segment within the Churches of Christ, it is faith plus no kitchens in
the church building; for a small majority, it is faith plus the King James
Version only—other translations are anathema; still for others, it is faith
plus grape juice in the Lord’s Supper—wine cannot be used; for a smaller
number, it is faith plus the head covering for women; and even for a smaller
number, it is faith plus long hair on women—women cannot even cut the dead ends
off their hair. For a few, it is faith plus a refusal to assist from the church
treasury the support of an evangelist through another local church—support must
be given directly to the minister, and so on.
All of the above oddities advanced by many
Christians are associated with the Gospel. The Gospel, for many Christians, is
identified as the twenty-seven books of the New Testament. Then, this concept
of the Gospel boils down to one’s interpretation of the twenty-seven books. If
one differs from a particular warring faction within the splintered Churches of
Christ, then each isolated group accuses the other of preaching another Gospel.
Just a perusal of some of the religious journals within the Churches of Christ
reveals that the Churches of Christ as a whole are preaching another Gospel.
For many Christians, the Gospel is defined as faith plus my interpretation of
the Scriptures.
If Christians are to avoid nullifying God’s
grace, one must understand what the Gospel of God is all about. In order for
one to preach the Gospel, one must first understand what the Gospel is. This
essay is designed to explore Paul’s own definition of the Gospel. What is the
Gospel? The answer to this question is found in Galatians 1:4. In 1:11, Paul labors the point as to what the Gospel is not. It is
not something that man made up. Paul, in the first chapter of Galatians, states
clearly that the Gospel he preached had to do with God’s Son (1:16). Paul objects to man’s substitution of
tradition plus the Gospel for salvation (2:3; 2:6). As one seeks to understand Galatians,
one needs to compare the tradition of circumcision to the traditions found
within many Churches of Christ. Numerous Christians have substituted their
oddities in pattern theology in place of circumcision. Churches today are
adding to God’s plan of salvation by faith in the same sense that the Judaizers
did concerning circumcision. Just as Peter’s withdrawal from table fellowship
from the Gentiles prevented Peter from walking in harmony with the truth of the
Gospel, so today, one’s withdrawal from table fellowship from other Christians
who do not subscribe to his/her brand of orthodoxy also fail to walk in harmony
with the truth of the Gospel.
The churches to which Paul wrote this Epistle were founded during his first missionary journey (see Acts 13 and 14). This Epistle to the churches in the province of Galatia was probably written about 48 CE (Common Era), the earliest of Paul’s letters. This letter reveals that certain Jewish Christians, who wanted to bind certain Old Testament rites as essential to salvation, especially circumcision, had infiltrated the churches in Pisidian Antioch, Iconium, Lystra, and Derbe. Paul’s adversaries had perverted the Gospel of Christ by adding additional requirements for justification. As a result of the actions of certain men, Paul sets forth a vigorous apologetic for justification by faith in Jesus alone, that is to say, nothing less and nothing more.
Countless Christians today read this Epistle without any consciousness that they too violate the Gospel of Christ just as the Judaizers did in Paul’s day. Just a few years ago, several preachers tried to get me thrown out of a Christian university for my stance that the Gospel of Christ is not twenty-seven books called the New Testament. In fact, these men were, in essence, preaching another gospel, that is, another way of justification other than by faith. When I began my ministry back in January 1951, I, too, taught another way of salvation, namely, salvation by works. Essentially then, according to my insight, the Gospel of Christ had to do with crossing every “t” and dotting every “i” according to the party creed, otherwise one was preaching another gospel. In the first fifteen years of my ministry, I don’t ever recall having heard a message on grace or justification by faith, which included my own preaching.
If one employed instrumental music in the praise service, then that fellowship was preaching another gospel. If one used individual communion cups in the Lord’s Supper, then this one was preaching another gospel. If anyone taught anything that my meticulous fellowship disagreed with, then the others were preaching another gospel. But after my excommunication from this fellowship, I identified with a congregation that employed individual communion cups and Sunday school. What I soon discovered was that they too utilized Galatians 1:6-9 to clobber everyone who refused to kowtow to their particular brand of orthodoxy. They just had a different set of agendas. Today, the narrow fellowship that I labored with in the beginning of my ministry (1951) is divided into several offshoots. But this same mentality, as a whole, is also true within the other fellowships. Why so many splinter groups among these believers? None can agree on what the Gospel of Christ is.
There is little difference today within many congregations from the Judaizers in Paul’s day. Christians today, as well as then, are divided over how a man is put in a right relationship with God—by works or by faith. A part of the confusion has come about as a result of the piece-meal hermeneutics that is so prevalent among numerous Christians. In other words, scores of Christians practice proof-texting instead of reading the book as a book for its flow of thoughts and teachings. The Gospel of Christ is as much an enigma today as it was to the Christian Judaizers. This confusion is as a result of numerous leaders within the Christian community who refuse to go back to the drawing board, so to speak, and to reexamine the traditions handed down by the forefathers within their distinctive society.
Some within the Churches of Christ have gone back to the text, but they have received tremendous opposition. There are scores of preachers and elders in my own hometown (Montgomery, AL) who have suffered attack for their stand on grace and fellowship with other believers. This castigation is generated within the various fellowships of the splinter groups that are also associated with the denominational Churches of Christ. This change of mind is true throughout numerous Churches of Christ, not just in Montgomery, AL. Hopefully, this brief overview of the Book of Galatians will assist every individual in his/her understanding more clearly what the Gospel of Christ is all about.
If one is going to define the word gospel
in the Book of Galatians, one must look to the book itself in order to arrive
at a clear and precise definition. In order for one to read things out of the
Book of Galatians and not read one’s own agenda into it, one must always
examine context. To illustrate how I, in my earlier ministry, read into the
text instead of out of the text, I will examine Galatians 1:6-9 in light of its immediate context. This
one unit of Scripture is one that I memorized as a boy preacher. In my
ignorance of this pericope (division or section of Scripture), I, in actuality,
zeroed in on preaching another gospel. The same is still true today in almost
every unique body of believers. Even
today, many of these devout Christians invariably substitute one law for
another law. For many Christians, Christianity is based upon a correct
application of the so-called new law or regulative principle of worship, that
is to say, five so-called acts of worship, which is also called pattern
theology within some movements associated with the Stone/Campbell Movement,
which law is more stringent than the Law of Moses; at least, this is the
interpretation according to some expositors.
The so-called “law of Christ” in Galatians 6:2 is generally identified, at least with
some Christians, with one’s own brand of orthodoxy, that is to say, one’s
interpretation of the Scriptures regarding the so-called five acts of worship,
not the law of love. Galatians 6:2, like Galatians 1:6-9, is interpreted by many sincere
Christians with smuggled prejudices from inherited traditions. As a result of
this looseness of interpretation, the flames of prejudice have burned into the
hearts of men and women for the last two hundred years beginning with the
Stone/Campbell Movement. Out of the Stone/Campbell Movement originated three
separate religious bodies: Churches of Christ, Christian Churches, and the
Disciples of Christ. And from the Churches of Christ came another twenty-five
or more idiosyncratic or unique fellowships.
Almost everyone within the various religious
bodies that grew out of this particular movement that had its original focus on
uniting Christians in all the assorted sects in Christendom have heard these
verses (1:6-9) cited to give credence to the rejection of other
believers on the pretense that they were preaching another gospel if they
violated the traditional understanding of the so-called five acts of worship.
Again, the problem of how to be faithful to the Gospel arose over the correct
interpretation of the five acts of worship, which, supposedly, God prescribed.
Churches divided over numerous issues and each eccentric fellowship accused the
other exclusive society of preaching another gospel. To some believers, the five acts is in essence the same as the
gospel that Paul writes about in Galatians 1:6-9. Why am I concerned about what is going
on within the various divisions within the Churches of Christ? I am dealing
with the Gospel. When one perverts the Gospel of Christ, one is treading on
dangerous ground. The nature of the gospel was of such importance in the scheme
of redemption that Paul even warned the Galatians that even if an angel
preached another gospel than the one he preached, they should let even the
angel be accursed. Listen to Paul as he writes:
I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called
you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—
7
which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are
throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach
a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let him be eternally
condemned! 9 As we have already said, so now I say
again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted,
let him be eternally condemned (Galatians 1:6-9)![1]
If one wishes to grasp the Gospel that Paul preached, one should consult the entire Book of Galatians in order to get a feel for the authentic nature of the Gospel of Christ. If something does not make sense, one should immediately consult the context. The context actually defines Galatians 1:6-9. One should, without delay, check with the words of Paul in 1:4 if he or she wishes to understand what the Gospel is that Paul proclaimed. In this verse, he goes right to the very heart of the Gospel; he takes the time to explain what the Gospel is all about before he warns the Galatians about the danger of preaching another gospel. Paul starts this Epistle with a ready definition of the Gospel. One should concentrate vigilantly to his explanation as he seeks to capture the very essence of the Gospel:
Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ,
4
who gave himself for our sins to rescue us from the present evil age,
according to the will of our God and Father, 5 to
whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen (Galatians 1:3-5).
As one cautiously reads verse four, one must ask certain questions: (1) what is the Gospel? and (2) what is the Gospel of God about? In response to the first question, one can quickly say that the answer is Jesus. In reply to the second question, one can say that the Gospel deals with God’s methodology of redemption, namely, Jesus. Yes, the Gospel is about the One who gave Himself for the sins of sinful humanity in order to rescue the fallen race from damnation. It is about what Jesus did in His atonement, not what man does. One can also say that this Gospel details that one’s justification before God can only be through faith in His Son, not works.
Immediately following his explanation of the Gospel (1:4), he then warns the Galatians that if any man proclaims another way of salvation other than through faith in Jesus, one should let that individual be “eternally condemned” (1:8). After that, in the next pericope (1:11-24), he informs the Galatians that the Gospel he proclaimed did not come from man.
I want you to know, brothers, that the gospel I preached is not
something that man made up. 12 I did not receive
it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation
from Jesus Christ (1:11-12).
Paul introduces his proclamation as something that did not originate with man, but rather with Jesus Christ. Identification of the Gospel that Paul preached (1:11) is essential to a correct understanding of the Gospel that he speaks of in 1:6-9. What did he preach? He preached Jesus. Listen to him as he reveals the substance of his preaching:
But when God, who set me apart from birth a and called me by his grace, was pleased 16 to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not consult any man (1:15-16).
The Gospel that Paul speaks of in 1:6-9 has to do with the preaching of Jesus, not man-made rituals, rituals of the Law of Moses, or even the Law itself. The Gospel has to do with preaching Jesus as God’s way of salvation. Even today, many Christians still do not understand the Gospel that Paul preached. It is not uncommon, as stated above, for certain Christians to identify the Gospel with their particular brand of orthodoxy. To add something to the Gospel as a condition of salvation is to destroy the very idea of grace. For one to add to the Gospel of God’s grace is to nullify grace.
Many Christians, unknowingly, have nullified God’s grace through their philosophy of “pattern theology,” that is, five prescribed rituals to be performed on Sunday morning between the hours of 9am to 10am. It is not just five prescribed rituals that nullify the Gospel, but the insistence that these five rituals must be performed in a prescribed way in order for one to have salvation. Thus, the Gospel of Christ is turned into another law that is more stringent than even the Law of Moses. For example, the Gospel, at least to some Christians, is reflected in the following beliefs:
· Acappella singing versus instrumental accompaniment
· Church name (Church of Christ)
· One cup in the distribution of the Lord’s Supper (The one-cup movement will not fellowship Christians who employ individual cups in the Lord’s Supper.)
· No Sunday school (This movement advances the idea that one cannot teach the Bible in classes on Sunday morning—must be taught in one assembly on Sunday morning.)
· Bible colleges (supported by congregations)
· Grape juice or wine in the Lord’s Supper
· Break bread or pinch bread in the Lord’s Supper
· Kitchen in the church building
· Orphan homes (supported by congregations)
· Church contributions (cannot be distributed to individuals that are not members of the church)
Unfortunately, as a young preacher boy, I was taught to memorize Galatians 1:6-9 and then apply these verses to many of the above items. The one who taught me was sincere in his understanding. In my judgment, his misapplication was not rebellion against God, but rather an honest mistake of the heart. Nevertheless, if one participated in Sunday school (Bible study) on Sunday morning, then this fellowship was preaching “another gospel.” If one used an instrument in the congregational singing, then one was preaching “another gospel.” If one broke the bread in the Lord’s Supper rather than pinch the bread (the bread had to remain one piece—no fragments), then one was accused of preaching “another gospel.” On and on this kind of analysis flowed/flows until the body of Christ was/is ripped apart into various warring factions, none could/can agree on what the Gospel was/is about. In the early 70s, I was accused of preaching another gospel when I refused to reject fellowship with Christians who employed individual communion cups and who participated in Sunday school. Thus, this strange fellowship threw me out of the synagogue for so-called unfaithfulness—that is, preaching another gospel.
As one reflects back upon 1:11—“the gospel I preached”—can one honestly identify the above list of ten items as “the gospel” that Paul preached? Again, what was the “revelation” (1:12) he received? Once more, the context is the deciding factor in understanding 1:11-12. Pay attention once more to Paul in 1:16 as he explains what it was that he preached: “to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles.” Again, one can hardly read 1:16 without a consciousness of 1:4: “Who gave himself for our sins to rescue us from the present evil age.”
When one adds
another condition to salvation other than faith in Jesus, one preaches another
gospel. Prior to Paul’s confrontation with Peter over how an individual is put
in a right relationship with God, he states that three years after his
conversion he went to Jerusalem to see Peter (1:18). It was
fourteen years later that he and Barnabas went to Jerusalem (2:1). This time he
went in response to a revelation that he received in order to “set before them
the gospel” that “he preached among the Gentiles” (2:2). The question
of circumcision and the keeping of the Law had infiltrated the fellowship of
believers. Paul, along with Barnabas and Titus, went privately to the leaders
in order to try to prevent this trip from ending in confusion as to the true
nature of the Gospel that Paul preached to the Gentiles and that Peter preached
to the Jews (2:2-4). Paul states emphatically that the leaders did not compel Titus to
be circumcised (2:3). Yet, there were certain
brothers who wanted to insist upon circumcision as a condition of salvation (2:4; see also Acts
15:1-2).
Paul refused to back down on the issue of adding another condition to salvation other than faith in the Son of God: “We did not give in to them for a moment, so that the truth of the gospel might remain with you” (Galatians 2:5). The leaders saw that the Gospel had been entrusted to Paul to preach to the Gentiles and that the Gospel had been entrusted to Peter to preach to the Jews (2:7). When one adds something to faith in Christ as a condition of salvation, then one must stand up for the “mystery” of God that had been hidden from ages past in order that “the truth of the gospel” might not be nullified. Later, Paul confronted Peter for his actions in withdrawing from eating with the Gentiles when certain men came from James (2:11-12). This withdrawal from the Gentiles created such confusion that “even Barnabas was led astray” (2:13). How did Paul react under such circumstances when “the truth of the gospel” was at stake? Paul expresses his reaction this way:
When I saw that they were not acting in line with the truth of the
gospel, I said to Peter in front of them all, “You are a Jew, yet you live
like a Gentile and not like a Jew. How is it, then, that you force Gentiles to
follow Jewish customs (2:14)?
A brief summary of what has been pointed out thus far is necessary in order for one not to forget the thrust of Paul’s arguments concerning the true nature of the Gospel of Christ. In 1:4, Paul gives the essence of the Gospel—“Who gave himself for our sins.” Then in 2:11, he reveals his desire to make known the gospel he preached. But in 2:16, he reveals the Gospel as Jesus. In 2:2, he sets before the leaders the Gospel that he preached among the Gentiles. After his encounter with certain men who came from James who wanted to add circumcision as a condition of salvation, he objected in order that “the truth of the gospel might remain” (2:4-5). Then later Paul had to rebuke Peter, along with others, for their adulterating the “truth of the gospel” with their withdrawal from the Gentiles (2:12-13). Once more, he captures their departure as not in harmony with the “truth of the gospel” (2:14). Paul did not rebuke Peter for preaching another gospel, but rather he rebuked him for his actions that were not in harmony with the very nature of the Good News concerning God’s way of salvation—faith in Jesus.
Just as Paul sets forth the nature of the
Gospel in 1:4, he now
goes right to the very heart of the Gospel in 2:15-16:
We who are Jews by birth and not ‘Gentile sinners’
16
know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith in
Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus that we
may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the law,
because by observing the law no one will be justified.
Just as the word mystery filled the Book of Ephesians, so the word faith flashes like neon lights across the Book of Galatians. The word faith is the key to grasping what the Gospel of God is all about. It is about God’s way of redeeming sinful humanity—through faith in His Son Jesus. God only has one way of salvation—faith in Jesus. The words “faith in Jesus Christ” and “justified by faith in Christ” set the tone for the rest of the Book as Paul seeks to explain the nature of the Gospel of Christ, that is to say, God’s way of justification. One can never be justified through observing law, or law keeping.
Paul drives home this point throughout this short Epistle. No one, writes Paul, can be justified through observing the Law (2:16). Again, the question that confronts everyone is: How does one live? Paul explains his own life by saying, “I live by faith in the Son of God” (2:20). Justification is “by faith.” But faith has for its object, Jesus. It is “by faith in Jesus Christ” and “justified by faith in Christ.” Galatians 2:20 should call forth Paul’s words in Ephesians 4:5: “one Lord, one faith.” The Gospel justifies those whom the Law condemns. Faith attributes salvation entirely to Christ, which eliminates works—works of any kind.
If righteousness could be obtained through law keeping, then Christ, according to Paul, “died for nothing” (Galatians 2:21b). When one seeks justification through rituals and regulations, regardless as to how good and beneficial, one sets aside the grace of God (2:21a). Having said this, Paul discusses the Spirit that God gave to the ones who responded to Jesus through faith. Leon Morris makes the point, and correctly so, that “no ritual act availed before God was central to the gospel he (Paul) preached and by which he lived. He preached Christ crucified, not circumcision.”[2]
Once more, Morris cuts away all the underbrush that men have added to salvation: “The Message about the cross means that people can do nothing to bring about their salvation, nothing at all. It insists that Christ has done all that is necessary by laying down his life in place of sinners.”[3] It is not uncommon for numerous Christians within the Churches of Christ to pass off the religious customs (traditions) from the church fathers as the Gospel of God. In other words, many Christians still confuse ritual prescriptions and religious requirements of oral tradition as the Gospel of Christ, that is to say, the Gospel that Paul preached. Christians must abandon their so-called five acts of worship as a prerequisite to salvation. It is not uncommon for many—not all--within the Churches of Christ to advance a notion of salvation through perfect obedience to the so-called new law concerning a worship service. Around this worship service, the five acts must be performed in a prescribed manner; otherwise, one is on his/her way to hell. For many, the right performance plus faith merits salvation, not faith alone.
When Peter and the others were not walking in line with the “truth of the Gospel” (2:14), Paul stepped in to stop the movement away from the very heart of the Gospel he preached. What is the “truth of the gospel”? It is justification by faith in Christ (2:16), pure and simple. Unless one grasps this concept, there can never be unity among God’s divided people, not just Church of Christ folk. As Ronald Y. K. Fung expresses it: “The truth of the gospel was none other than justification by faith in Christ alone and not by works of the law—a principle which applied to Jew and Gentile alike and hence was the basis of the Church’s unity.”[4]
Paul questions the Galatians about how they received the Holy Spirit. He asked: “Did you receive the Spirit by observing the law, or by believing what you heard?” (3:2). How did they receive the Holy Spirit? It is obvious that they received the Holy Spirit after they believed the message of salvation by grace alone through faith alone. Salvation can never be through human efforts. Paul cuts away all underbrush concerning salvation when he writes: “Are you so foolish? After beginning with the Spirit, are you now trying to attain your goal by human effort?” (3:3).
Paul employs repetition as a means of calling attention to the very heart of the Gospel. In verse three, he informed the Galatians that they received the Spirit by believing what they heard (3:2-3). Now, once more, he calls attention to the Holy Spirit as a gift: “Does God give you his Spirit and work miracles among you because you observe the law, or because you believe what you heard?” (3:5). Again, it is law versus faith. In order to reinforce his arguments, he introduces Abraham and his faith. Over again, one observes the word believed as Paul develops the means of receiving the righteousness that belongs to God. He writes:
Consider Abraham: “He believed God, and it was credited to him
as righteousness.” 7 Understand, then,
that those who believe are children of Abraham. 8 The
Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, and
announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: “All nations will be blessed
through you.” 9 So those who
have faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith (3:6-9).
One
can hardly read this pericope (unit or section) without cognition of the word faith as employed by Paul. The following
expressions utilized by Paul stands out, as it were, in bold neon lights: “He
believed,” “those who believe,” “justify the Gentiles by faith,” “those who
have faith,” and “Abraham, the man of faith.” Since “The Scriptures foresaw
that God would justify the Gentiles by faith,” Paul writes that God “announced
the gospel in advance to Abraham.” The context lays emphasis, not on Abraham’s
faithfulness, but on Abraham’s faith. The Gospel announced in advance to
Abraham is the Gospel that Paul announces in 1:4 and, at the same
time, cautions one about preaching another way of salvation other than that
which Jesus offers to anyone who believes in Him (see also John 3:14-18, 36; 5:24; 6:29, 40, 47).
Paul places a curse upon anyone who preaches another way of justification before God other than “faith” in Jesus the Son of God” (1:6-9). Paul stresses that salvation can never be through “human effort,” but only through faith in Jesus the Savior of the world (3:3, 11, 14). One must question the substance of what was announced to Abraham in advance in order to clearly see the positive aspects of the Gospel of Christ. What was announced to Abraham in advance? Yes, the Gospel was announced in advance. What is the Gospel? As stated above, many identify the Gospel with their particular brand of orthodoxy. In other words, the various denominational Churches of Christ determine their own “human effort” as the means of obtaining salvation, not faith in Jesus. It is always “faith” plus their “interpretation” of isolated Scriptures from their contexts. Why is the Gospel so difficult for some Christians to understand? The answer lies in the hermeneutics (science of interpretation). For example, the hermeneutical method utilized by the various theological factions today determine what Galatians 1:6-9 should say beforehand in order to support their theological system of aloofness.
Almost any interpretation can be placed upon a verse(s) if the context is ignored. One must first determine the context before application. If one expects to interpret the word gospel in Galatians, one must first learn to pay attention to the context—the Book of Galatians. It is not uncommon for the Book of Galatians to be read through the lens of one’s own particular warring splinter group. When one encounters an interpretation that does not make sense, then one must go digging for answers to solve the hermeneutical dilemma. In response to the question above: What was announced in advance to Abraham? If one says that the Gospel is twenty-seven books called the New Testament, then one is confronted with a correct interpretation of this so-called new law book in order for one not to preach “another gospel,” for each of the twenty-five or more divisions within the Stone/Campbell Movement asserts that it, and it alone, is preaching the true gospel. Ultimately, the Gospel of Christ boils down to one’s odd interpretation of certain isolated texts from its context.
When one assigns an interpretation of the gospel announced to Abraham with the so-called prescribed five acts of worship, one immediately sees the folly of such an interpretation. Did God announce in advance that the singing in the Christians’ community must be a cappella rather than instrumental? Did God announce in advance that the Lord’s Supper must be observed with one cup upon the table rather than each person having his/her own cup in the drinking of the Cup of Blessing? Did God announce in advance that in the Lord’s Supper one must “pinch” the bread rather than “break” the bread? Did God announce to Abraham that in the time of Christ (2000 years in the future), Christians could not have a kitchen in the church building? Did God announce in advance to Abraham that in the Lord’s Supper one must use grape juice rather than wine? This list is almost ad infinitum. The various oddities depend on which of the several of militaristic groups that one talks to. Each distinctive society of believers has its own agenda as to what the Gospel of Christ is all about.
Again, one must ask the question: What was announced in advance to Abraham almost two thousand years before the Word became flesh (John 1:14)? The answer is that God announced to Abraham His means of justifying sinful humanity, that is to say, faith in Jesus. Jesus is the object of one’s faith. Salvation is by grace alone through faith alone in the finished work of Christ. Paul states the record very clearly on this point:
Clearly no one is justified before God by the law, because, “The righteous will live by faith.” d 12 The law is not based on faith; on the contrary, “The man who does these things will live by them.” e 13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.” f 14 He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit (Galatians 3:11-14).
Once more, one discovers that the word faith flashes like neon lights in these words of Paul as he seeks to set forth the very heart of the Gospel announced in advance to Abraham two thousand years earlier. The blessing given to Abraham is available to everyone through Christ Jesus. Thus, it is through faith that one receives the promise of the Spirit (3:2-3, 14), not human effort (3:3). In order for Paul to nail down his arguments, he says,
Brothers, let me take an example from everyday life. Just as no one can
set aside or add to a human covenant that has been duly established, so it is
in this case. 16 The promises were spoken to Abraham
and to his seed. The Scripture does not say “and to seeds,” meaning many
people, but “and to your seed,” a meaning
one person, who is Christ (3:15-16).
He did not say as to SEEDS as of many, but rather to SEED, meaning one person, who is Christ. This is the Gospel. The Gospel is the Good News of God’s way of salvation by faith. This same thought is presented in Paul’s words to the Ephesians: “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9). When one says by “faith alone,” one is not falsifying Paul’s words to the Ephesians. This phrase only clarifies and emphasizes what Paul clearly says. On the other hand, the Judaizers wanted to make human efforts, in addition to faith in Jesus, the means of salvation, but Paul says NO! Paul, as he concludes his arguments about the Law, writes: “But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe” (Galatians 3:22).
Paul drives home the point that one’s right standing with God is not based upon human efforts, but rather one’s standing before God is based upon “faith.” Take note once more to Paul as he seeks to nail the coffin shut concerning the place of law in the life of the believer: “Before this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until faith should be revealed. 24 So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith. 25 Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law” (3:23-25). The following chart sets forth the thrust of the entire Book of Galatians:
|
Galatians
2:15-16 |
Galatians
3:23-25 |
|
We who are Jews by birth and not ‘Gentile sinners’
16
know that a man is not justified by observing the law, but by faith
in Jesus Christ. So we, too, have put our faith in Christ Jesus
that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by observing the
law, because by observing the law no one will be justified. |
Before this faith came, we were held prisoners by the law, locked up until faith should be revealed. 24 So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ b that we might be justified by faith. 25 Now that faith has come, we are no longer under the supervision of the law. |
Justification by faith in Christ is the Gospel announced in advance to Abraham. Before “the faith” came, the Law held individuals prisoners. The Law was designed to lead one to Christ in order that one might be justified by faith. Paul expresses this same thought in his letter to the Romans:
Now we know that whatever the law says, it says to those who are under the law, so that every mouth may be silenced and the whole world held accountable to God. 20 Therefore no one will be declared righteous in his sight by observing the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of sin (Romans 3:19-20).
When one looks at the Law of God, one cannot open his/her mouth in his/her defense. The Law of God shuts every person’s mouth. It is not until one is consciously black-and-blue from the demands of the Law and, at the same time, smitten by the Law of God to the very core of his/her soul that one will turn to the Gospel for the healing of his/her wounds. Until one is seized by and jailed by the Law of God, one will not change direction to Christ for freedom from guilt. Until one is condemned and killed by the Law, one will not call upon Christ for justification.[5]
The Gospel of Christ is the Good News of justification by grace through faith in His Son Jesus Christ. God accomplished redemption for sinful humanity through the cross of Christ. The Book of Galatians is full of the cross of Christ. Without the cross of Christ, one can say that justification of the unjust would be unjustified. It is through the cross that God rescues humanity from condemnation. God’s answer to sin is the cross. What did Christ do upon the Cross? Listen to Paul as he details this information to the Galatians:
|
Galatians
1:3-5 |
Galatians
2:20-21 |
Galatians
3:13-14 |
|
Grace and peace to you from God our Father
and the Lord Jesus Christ, 4 who gave himself
for our sins to rescue us from the present evil age, according to the
will of our God and Father, 5 to whom be glory for
ever and ever. Amen. |
I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ
lives in me. The life I live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who
loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not
set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the
law, Christ died for nothing! |
Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us, for it is written: “Cursed is everyone who is hung on a tree.” f 14 He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit. |
The only reason that God can justify sinful humanity is that Christ died for the ungodly upon the cruel cross of Calvary. The Book of Galatians sets forth, in clear terms, God’s means of justification, which is by faith in Jesus. As chapter three concludes, Paul again calls attention to how individuals become children of God: “You are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:26). In verse twenty-four of this same chapter, he writes: “So the law was put in charge to lead us to Christ that we might be justified by faith.” Then in verse twenty-two, Paul pens: “But the Scripture declares that the whole world is a prisoner of sin, so that what was promised, being given through faith in Jesus Christ, might be given to those who believe.” Again, as one, once more peruses chapter three, one observes that the word faith fills this chapter. Listen to Paul as he expresses how one receives the promise of the Sprit: “He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit” (3:14).
In 3:26-29, Paul sets forth “faith” in Christ as that which levels all humanity. The Judaizers could not accept this principle of faith. Even today, many Christians cannot accept the finished work of Christ on Calvary. Nevertheless, Paul drove home the point that Christ secured salvation for all who would put their faith in Him. In other words, Christ has accomplished it all in His curse-bearing death upon the cross (3:13). Salvation is through faith in Him. Salvation rests upon the finished work of Christ through His sin-bearing death and His curse-bearing death, which is embraced by faith. Every believer must bear in mind that the source of one’s salvation is God; the ground of one’s justification is Jesus, and the means of one’s justification is by faith. Paul in his Roman epistle sets forth this same understanding. In chapter 3, Paul writes:
God presented him
as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith
in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his
forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— 26
he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be
just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus (Romans 3:25-26).
One
should remember that justification is by grace alone, in Christ alone, and
through faith alone; it can be no other way. This is what Paul stresses from
beginning to end in the Book of Galatians. Biblical faith has Jesus for its
object. John R.W. Stott expresses this truth with care and eloquence when he
writes: “The value of faith is not to be found in itself, but entirely and
exclusively in its object, namely Jesus Christ and him crucified.”[6] In the first three chapters,
Paul covers a period of two thousand years of history. He began with God’s
promise to Abraham (born: 2166 BCE) concerning his SEED, which is Christ (3:6-25).
In Romans Four,
Paul develops this subject in greater detail.
In chapter
three of Galatians, he writes concerning Abraham’s faith: “He
believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness” (3:6).
CHAPTER FOUR
Bondage versus Freedom
4:1-11
In
chapter four,
Paul continues to develop the subject of salvation through faith. In order for
one to receive the “full rights of sons” (4:5), Jesus came to
redeem individuals from the Law (4:4). One can only receive the “full rights
of sons” through the finished work of Christ upon the cross. One can only
appropriate this freedom through faith in Jesus. When one is redeemed from Law,
God sends forth the Sprit of His Son into his/her heart. Paul stresses that
this giving of the Sprit did not come through Law keeping, but rather through
faith (3:2-5;
4:4-6). As stated
above, in chapter
three, Paul covers two thousand years of Old Testament
history beginning with God’s call of Abraham out of Ur of Chaldea. In the third chapter,
he analyzed three great figures—Abraham, Moses, and Christ.
He
calls forth Abraham to show that God promised to bless all nations through his
seed. Then he calls attention to the giving of the Law to Moses, which, in and
of itself, did not annul the promise God made to Abraham, but, on the other
hand, made the coming of Christ more imperative. For Paul, the Law acted as a means
of driving men and women to Him for release from their burdens of sin and
guilt. Now, in the fourth chapter of Galatians, Paul covers
once more the past that he dealt with in chapter three. In verses 1-3,
he discusses the condition of men and women under the Law—slavery. Next, in verses 4-8,
he talks about the situation of men and women in Christ—sons of God. Then, in verses 9-11,
he bemoans the fact that many were turning back to slavery—enslaved all over
again. Stott summarizes these eleven verses by saying, “Once we were slaves.
Now we are sons. How, then, can we turn back to the old slavery?”[7]
Many
Christians today are exchanging the Gospel of God’s grace for good works.
Within many churches, the good works are related to the so-called five-step plan
of salvation and the so-called five-acts of worship performed on Sunday morning
in a prescribed manner, which usually rules out mechanical instruments in
praise to God. The Book of Galatians is as timely today as it was almost two
thousand years ago. The orthodoxy of many churches completely obscures the
truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. When one adds his/her own brand of
orthodoxy as a condition of salvation, this one adds to the conditions of
salvation as much as the Judaizers did that Paul confronted in his Galatian
letter. In the biographical information about Paul (Philippians 3:1-11), one
quickly discovers that Paul was converted from one understanding of
righteousness to another—from his own righteousness of works to God’s
righteousness by faith (see also Romans 9:30—10:21)
Paul,
in the Book of Galatians, labors the point that there is a difference between a
religion of works and a religion of grace. For Paul, there is only one
Gospel—justification by faith through the finished work of Christ upon Calvary.
Many, especially those within the various factions of the Churches of Christ,
have added their own requirements to the Gospel message. Many believers see
religion as keeping certain rules and regulations, not justification by faith
in Jesus Christ. When anyone adds something to the Gospel of Christ as a
condition of salvation, this one destroys the Gospel of grace. The central
truth of the Gospel, as pointed out earlier, concerns the one who gave Himself
for our sins (see Galatians
1:4).
The
essential message of the Gospel is Christ crucified for the sins of humanity.
Salvation is available through God’s grace alone, and anyone who obscures
salvation by faith alone must be opposed. What God has accomplished through the
atonement of Christ is the Gospel message of salvation. When one adds his/her
beliefs concerning the use of one-cup in the Lord’s Supper, a cappella music
only, no kitchens in the church building, no Sunday schools, and so on, this
one actually nullifies the Gospel of God’s grace. When one adds to the Gospel
of God’s grace, this person is preaching another gospel. The essence of the
Gospel is the risen Jesus.
Paul’s Concern for the
Galatians
4:12-20
Paul expresses
his deep concern for the Galatians lack of concern for the freedom they
experienced in Jesus Christ through the Gospel. Many were “turning back to
those weak and miserable principles” that had previously enslaved them (4:9). Some of the
believers desired to reinstate the ceremonial aspects of the Law as well as the
keeping of the Law itself as a condition of salvation (4:10; see also Acts
15:1-5). Paul objected to the Judaizers’ emphasis upon circumcision and
the keeping of the Law as a condition of salvation. Consequently, Paul became
an enemy of some within the congregations scattered throughout the province of
Galatia because he told them the truth about God’s way of salvation—by grace
alone and through faith alone in the finished work of Christ upon the cross. In
fact, he writes: “Have I now become your enemy by telling you the truth?” (Galatians
4:16).
Many Christians today are receiving the brunt of ostracism by many other sincere zealous individuals who have never allowed Christ to be formed in them (see also 4:19). This author, Dallas Burdette, talked at length with one of his second cousins recently (7-30-02) about his having received chastisement from his own typical fellowship for daring to preach on God’s grace as the way of salvation. His own fleshly brother who is a deacon in this same fellowship of Christians also came under the wrath of the powers that be. Also, in this same congregation in Texas, another brother (no fleshly relationship) was called on the carpet for preaching too much about Jesus. He, too, was told to preach on the issues, that is to say, one-cup, no Sunday school, no instrumental music, and so on. Again, one witnesses many individuals within the one-cup movement that are seeking to recapture the very heart of the Gospel. This effort is quite wide in almost every segment within the Churches of Christ. Many preachers and elders are having great success in this area. Presently, I study with several preachers within the Churches of Christ, and everyone that I study with is preaching grace. Even though I am dealing with the Churches of Christ as a whole, one must never forget that within this movement there is a movement to draw people back to a true understanding of the Gospel.
These three episodes are not isolated events within this very narrow, sectarian group. What were these three men accused of? They were accused of being “grace preachers.” In fact, one of these men was called a “false teacher” for preaching on grace. Hopefully, one can understand why the Book of Galatians is as relevant today as it was when Paul wrote this forceful letter against the legalist. When congregations do not like the message of grace, the preachers of grace become the enemies of these individuals, or other congregations who do not preach grace as God’s way of salvation. Those individuals and congregations who preach grace are blackballed from the so-called loyal churches—party loyalty must be maintained at all cost. This mindset is not just true within this distinctive fellowship, but it is true among other churches out of the Stone/Campbell Movement. In other words, the private theological whims of some preachers become the Gospel of Christ, that is to say, their own subjective doctrinal fancies.
Hagar
and Sarah
4:21-31
Paul continues his arguments against the Judaizers in order to try to convince those reverting back to Judaism to think about what they are doing. Paul discusses Abraham, Sarah, Hagar, Ishmael, Isaac, Mount Sinai, and Jerusalem in order to drive home his message of salvation by faith in Jesus Christ (see also 2:16; 3:11). This pericope is addressed to those “who want to be under the law” (4:21). The Judaizers wanted to turn the Gospel of God’s grace into law. They, like so many Christians today, advanced the notion that strict adherence to regulations, to traditions, and to ceremonies is what puts one in a right relationship with God. In other words, salvation is not based on faith alone in Jesus, but rather upon one’s correctly adhering to the proper performance of certain works as defined by the religious leaders. For Paul, anyone who lives under law is under condemnation—and I might add that this is true of any law, not just the Law of Moses. The Law of Moses pointed individuals to the One who would bring salvation.
The
Historical: Abraham
4:22-23
In this section of Scripture (4:21-31), Paul calls forth the historical (4:22-23), the allegorical/typological (4:24-27), and the personal (4:28-31) to illustrate beyond doubt the true nature of the Gospel he originally set forth on his first missionary tour (see also 4:13; Acts 13:1—14:28). Paul, like John the Baptist (Matthew 3:7-12), calls attention to the fact that true descent from Abraham is not physical but spiritual (Galatians 3:26-29; Romans 4:16). The following chart sets forth in parallel columns the misunderstanding of the religious leaders perception of salvation as well as the correct interpretation of the data in the Book of Genesis and Galatians concerning Abraham as the father of the faithful:
|
Matthew
3:9 |
Galatians
3:29 |
|
And do not think you can say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our
father.’ I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for
Abraham. |
If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs
according to the promise. |
Both John the Baptist and Paul zero in on the true seed of Abraham. The historical element of chapter 4 (vv. 22-23) is also illustrated in chapter 3. One should read these two verses with the comprehension that Paul is endeavoring to bolster his claim that justification is by faith alone. Earlier, in chapter 3, Paul elaborates on what John the Baptist implied in his message about the true nature of Abraham’s seed and what Jesus specifically asserted in His confrontation with the Jews (John 8:31-34). Paul puts forth the point that the blessing God promised to Abraham comes not upon the Jews through natural descent, but upon all who believe—whether Jews or Gentiles. Paul writes: “He redeemed us in order that the blessing given to Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Jesus, so that by faith we might receive the promise of the Spirit” (3:14). In Paul’s letter to Rome, he writes about one who is and who is not a true Jew:
A man is not a Jew if he is only one outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical. 29 No, a man is a Jew if he is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a man’s praise is not from men, but from God (Romans 3:28-29).
Paul illustrates his argument about the true seed of Abraham by calling attention to two of Abraham’s sons. He writes:
For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and the other by the free woman. 23 His son by the slave woman was born in the ordinary way; but his son by the free woman was born as the result of a promise (4:22-23).
Paul draws two important distinctions between these two brothers—Ishmael and Isaac. Even though both boys had the same father, they did not have the same mother. The boys took after their mothers. Since Hagar was a slave, Ishmael was born into slavery. On the other hand, Sara was free; therefore, Isaac was born into freedom. Stott correctly says that “Isaac was not born according to nature, but rather against nature. . . . Ishmael was born according to nature, but Isaac against nature, supernaturally, through an exceptional promise of God.”[8]
Thus, Paul emphasizes that everyone is either slave or free. If one is in Christ, he/she is no longer a slave but free. God’s grace sets one free without the deeds of the Law. If one is a Christian, one has been born not of natural means, but rather one is born again through supernatural means. One can hardly reflect upon Paul’s argument concerning justification without recalling what he said earlier in this same epistle: “The Scripture foresaw that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, and announced the gospel in advance to Abraham: ‘All nations will be blessed through you.’ 9 So those who have faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith” (3:8-9).
The
Allegory (Figurative/Typological): Hagar and Sarah
4: 24-27
Just as Ishmael
and Isaac represent spiritual truth concerning slavery and freedom, so also
Hagar and Sarah stand for two covenants. Hagar represents the Old Covenant,
whereas Sarah represents the New Covenant. Yet, in the allegory/typology, one
discovers that Paul paints another picture. These two women not only represent
two covenants, but they also represent two Jerusalems, the earthly and the
heavenly. Again, one should turn to Paul’s arguments and listen attentively to
him as he develops his arguments to uphold his thesis that one is justified by
faith, not by the deeds of the Law. Again, his arguments go back to Abraham,
the one justified through faith:
These things may be taken figuratively, for the women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears children who are to be slaves: This is Hagar. 25 Now Hagar stands for Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present city of Jerusalem, because she is in slavery with her children. 26 But the Jerusalem that is above is free, and she is our mother. 27 For it is written: “Be glad, O barren woman, who bears no children; break forth and cry aloud, you who have no labor pains; because more are the children of the desolate woman than of her who has a husband.” (4:24-27).
Hagar, according to Paul’s arguments, represents “Mount Sinai,” and Sara represents the new “Jerusalem that is above.” This New Jerusalem is our mother, not Mount Sinai, which represents slavery. This section by Paul is written in order to give historical testimony to his principle of justification by faith. Thus, he goes back two thousand years to God’s covenant with Abraham to give greater force to his arguments concerning justification by faith. Paul is not advancing a new theology, but rather he is setting forth Abraham as one who was justified by faith alone, without circumcision or works of the Law. Stott captures the very essence of Paul’s position when he writes:
This, then, is the allegory. Abraham had two sons, Ishmael and Isaac, born of two mothers, Hagar and Sarah, who represent two covenants and two Jerusalems. Hagar the slave stands for the old covenant, and her son Ishmael symbolizes the church of the earthly Jerusalem. Sarah the free woman stands for the new covenant and her son Isaac symbolizes the church of the heavenly Jerusalem. Although superficially similar, because both were sons of Abraham, the two boys were fundamentally different. In the same way, Paul is arguing, it is not enough to claim Abraham as our father. The crucial question concerns who our mother is. If it is Hagar, we are like Ishmael, but if it is Sarah, we are like Isaac.[9]
Just as many Jews failed to understand that
legal bondage and spiritual freedom cannot co-exist, one must go. Thus, when
Paul and others addressed the issue of freedom in Christ or freedom from the
Law of Moses, this teaching created turmoil and resulted in the Jews waging a
war against Christians. A religion of
regulations, as existed among the Jews, could not continue to exist if the set
of laws were not strictly enforced. Today, legalistic bondage, within many
local congregations of the Churches of Christ, also persecutes those who dare
to disagree with the status quo. The status quo must be maintained at all cost.
This mental concept of bondage is the very reason that so many churches are
hopelessly divided into warring factions.
What is the answer to our divisions? Until Christians understand that
faith in Jesus is the unifying factor, there will never be unity within this
Movement that started out as a movement to unite Christians in all the sects.
If Christians want unity, then grace and love must permeate the lives of every
believer. Morris has captured the very heart of grace: “When grace is central,
the person has made love his dominant principle . . . it will be the power of
that love and not the constraint of law that keeps us right, and love is always
more powerful than law.”[10]
Personal
Application: Isaac Versus Ishmael
4:28-31
Paul turns, as it were, from Sarah and Hagar to the two boys—Isaac and
Ishmael. Even though both boys were born of natural birth, nevertheless, one of
the boys (Isaac) was born by the “power of the Spirit,” not in the “ordinary
way” (4:29). Sarah was ninety years old when she became pregnant (Genesis 17:17). If one wishes to share in the
inheritance, one can only share in this blessing through the “free woman” (4:30). Paul’s argument is that if one is a
Christian, this one is like Isaac, not Ishmael. In other words, Christians are
sons through supernatural means, not natural means. To express this truth
differently, the words of John are appropriate to express this same truth:
He was in
the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not
recognize him. 11 He came to that which was his own,
but his own did not receive him. 12 Yet to all who
received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to
become children of God—13 children born not of
natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s
will, but born of God (John 1:10-13).
It is in this same vein that Paul in the fourth chapter of Romans also sets forth the means of Abraham’s justification before God. Paul says, “What does the Scripture say? Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness” (4:3). Again, Paul writes: “The promise comes by faith, so that it may be by grace and may be guaranteed to all Abraham’s offspring—not only to those who are of the law but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham. He is the father of us all” (4:16). Is it any wonder that Paul addresses the subject of faith in Galatians prior to his illustrations conce